{"id":1831,"date":"2015-10-27T16:31:28","date_gmt":"2015-10-27T16:31:28","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/cinemacocoa.com\/?p=1831"},"modified":"2015-10-27T16:31:28","modified_gmt":"2015-10-27T16:31:28","slug":"review-spectre","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/cinemacocoa.com\/?p=1831","title":{"rendered":"Review: Spectre"},"content":{"rendered":"

\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

After the colossal success of Skyfall<\/span><\/em> director Sam Mendes and Daniel Craig return to bring Bond’s origin story to completion. It… is a bumpy ride.<\/p>\n

Bond is on the ropes once again at the MI6, M has him grounded after he causes chaos in Mexico City while hunting down a man the previous M had secretly instructed him to find. This leads Bond down a path to further discover his past, and a conspiracy that links all his previous missions. Meanwhile, MI6 faces a merger with MI5 to become a new intelligence agency without need of double-oh agents…<\/p>\n

If Skyfall<\/span><\/em> was\u00a0The Dark Knight<\/span><\/em>, Spectre<\/span><\/em> is The Dark Knight Rises<\/span><\/em>. With its previous instalment being such a huge success as well as being incredibly unique in the now\u00a0twenty-four entries of the franchise, Spectre<\/span><\/em> is completely up against it. Unfortunately what appears to be a more traditional Bond film from the outset, is exactly\u00a0that.
\nSpectre<\/span><\/em> (or correctly spelt: S.P.E.C.T.R.E) relies on a lot of mystery and a lot of setup in its task of tying up the underlying plot of the last three films. But avid fans have already called it out; much as with the “twist” of JJ Abrams’ Star Trek Into Darkness<\/span><\/em>, Spectre’s<\/span><\/em> title isn’t the only problem undermining the film’s attempts at mystique. It feels like\u00a0an conspicuous\u00a0attempt to remake the series.<\/p>\n

The film is surprisingly slow and sporadically\u00a0paced (a bit like Sam Smith’s whining, warbling theme The Writing’s on the Wall<\/span><\/em>, which has not improved with time)\u00a0especially for a Bond film.\u00a0We leap from location to location at the drop of an editor’s hat.\u00a0Most of the story is expositional and setup for a payoff most people already know is coming. The dissolving of MI6 is positively dull, Ralph Fiennes as M working with an\u00a0unimaginative script,\u00a0a battle of wits\u00a0with Andrew Scott (Moriarty from BBC’s Sherlock<\/span><\/em>… totally not playing\u00a0a villain…)
\nAction scenes are haphazard and quite baffling. Compared to Skyfall’s<\/span><\/em> train-top earthmover stunt, or the fight in Shanghai,\u00a0Spectre<\/span><\/em> has you more likely scratching your head asking Bond what exactly he hopes to achieve. A lot of stock is put into Dave Bautista (Guardians of the Galaxy) as Spectre’s silent\u00a0lead muscleman (who has apparently watched too much Game of Thrones) <\/span><\/em>but\u00a0apart from an\u00a0excellent\u00a0punch up\u00a0in a train, his scenes feel more like\u00a0the completion of a checklist\u00a0than anything relevant.<\/p>\n

It isn’t all bad though. It earns respect for thematically tying the last decade worth of Bond films together, heck it even references the often reviled Quantum of Solace<\/span><\/em> more than once! The\u00a0film is in line with\u00a0a more traditional Bond experience: a globe-trotting plot; a larger than life villain henchman who hounds Bond at\u00a0every turn; a romantic train journey; isolated\u00a0super villain hideouts; a comedic edge to proceedings. Indeed, if one thing saves<\/span><\/em> the film it\u00a0is actually\u00a0the comedy. Bond and Q have a great chemistry still. Christoph Waltz as the villain of course is good, although he is\u00a0playing the character he has always played.
\nIf Daniel Craig’s Bond films are the first films you are watching, this works as a decent segue into more from the franchise, even if it is a clear sign that the future will be either more derivative or remakes.<\/p>\n

It has none of its predecessor’s smarts or uniqueness, and while it is perhaps the most fun of Daniel Craig’s films it is laboriously slow at getting to the point. Skyfall<\/span><\/em> was a peak that Bond perhaps will never attain again, and bringing back a reluctant director and lead actor to capture that lightning once again was likely\u00a0a mistake. While the predecessor was a celebration, this is more of an homage.<\/p>\n

Lower your expectations and you will enjoy it for its action and its quick wit, its more classic Bond call backs and Daniel Craig still delivers Bond’s more severe personality well. But I found it a slog to get through, with too much setup for a reveal that was completely expected.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

Additional Marshmallows: What does S.P.E.C.T.R.E stand for? Special Executive for Counter-intelligence, Terrorism, Revenge and Extortion. Now you know!<\/p>\n